Re: Refactoring of heapam code.
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Refactoring of heapam code. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CACjxUsPHCNvLtX=5yV+VCXO0UncV4fAZVg9HYbLSPTi2pSR7Hw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Refactoring of heapam code. (Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Refactoring of heapam code.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > They can be logically separated into three categories: > "primary storage" - r, S, t, v. They store data and visibility information. > The only implementation is heapam.c > "secondary index" - i. They store some data and pointers to primary storage. > Various existing AMs and managed by AM API. > "virtual relations" - c, f, m. They have no physical storage, only entries > in caches and catalogs. Materialized views (relkind == "m") have physical storage, and may have indexes. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: