Re: MVCC overheads
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MVCC overheads |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CACjxUsPFHowdEZyuR5606Y1vyUP6Udr3nuV0Yu556M1otx_dag@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | MVCC overheads (Pete Stevenson <etep.nosnevets@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Pete Stevenson <etep.nosnevets@gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to find some analysis (published work, blog posts) > on the overheads affiliated with the guarantees provided by MVCC > isolation. There are three levels of isolation implemented[1]; the incremental cost of SERIALIZABLE isolation over REPEATABLE READ for several standard benchmarking loads is available in section 8 of a paper presented an a VLDB conference[2]. Hopefully that helps some. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company [1] PostgreSQL current online documentation. Transaction Isolation. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/transaction-iso.html [2] Dan R. K. Ports and Kevin Grittner. 2012. Serializable Snapshot Isolation in PostgreSQL. Proceedings of the VLDBEndowment, Vol. 5, No. 12. The 38th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, August 27th - 31st 2012,Istanbul, Turkey. http://vldb.org/pvldb/vol5/p1850_danrkports_vldb2012.pdf
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: