Re: [HACKERS] recent deadlock regression test failures
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] recent deadlock regression test failures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CACjxUsNNnQJ3O_G2S-pREzUD4doaWSy-3sm6TkcRSXqa6nJ07A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] recent deadlock regression test failures (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] recent deadlock regression test failures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 04/07/2017 12:57 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> I don't think any recent changes are supposed to affect deadlock >>> detector behaviour? > >> Both these machines have CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS set. And on both machines >> recent changes have made the isolation tests run much much longer. > > Ouch. I see friarbird's run time for the isolation tests has gone from an > hour and change to over 5 hours in one fell swoop. hyrax not much better. > Oddly, non-CCA animals don't seem to have changed much. > > Eyeing recent patches, it seems like the culprit must be Kevin's > addition to isolationtester's wait query: Ouch. Without this we don't have regression test coverage for the SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE code, but it's probably not worth adding 4 hours to any tests, even if it only shows up with CLOBBER_CACHE_ONLY. I assume the consensus is that I should revert it? -- Kevin Grittner
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: