Re: Snapshot too old logging
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Snapshot too old logging |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CACjxUsNCUYw85x_fApS4JMOdMvFU0cU-d=Quq_HLi7t4wy8ctw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Snapshot too old logging (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> Is there value in showing which snapshot as well? Something like: >> DETAIL: snapshot <xyz> is too old to access relation <relation> > > Snapshots don't have names, and I can't think of a useful way of > identifying them to users. The time that the snapshot was taken might be useful; I can't think of anything else that would be. The main thing would be to include the relation, with an indication that it's not necessarily true that access to *any* part of the relation would be a problem. Mentioning the block number would tend to support that idea, and might be of some use. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: