Re: PostGIS 2.1 removed from Debian Wheezy 7.6 Backports
| От | Dan Fowler |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostGIS 2.1 removed from Debian Wheezy 7.6 Backports |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CACg1cLROECFTGk01gEP5sMK0NNHd0dCzb2AqNMyzFd3=utbe0A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostGIS 2.1 removed from Debian Wheezy 7.6 Backports (Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostGIS 2.1 removed from Debian Wheezy 7.6
Backports
|
| Список | pgsql-pkg-debian |
Christoph,
Yes - it does persist.
root@qdb92-test:~# apt-get update
root@qdb92-test:~# apt-get update
[...successful update run...]
root@qdb92-test:~# apt-get install postgresql-9.1-postgis-2.1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package postgresql-9.1-postgis-2.1
E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'postgresql-9.1-postgis-2.1'
Is it possible that adding the apt.postgresql.org repo and key would fix the issue, or could that create dependency/version issues between my current deployments (PostgreSQL 9.1 with PostGIS 2.1.3)?
Dan
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Christoph Berg <cb@df7cb.de> wrote:
Re: Dan Fowler 2014-10-07 <CACg1cLTWVcg8cLy7+AEc1tN9FVPJfs=2r8auost0PKnMbop_9Q@mail.gmail.com>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed this morning that the "postgresql-9.1-postgis-2.1" package
> previously available to my wheezy 7.6 backports images is no longer
> available.
>
> Could anyone confirm this and/or recommend a workaround other than
> compiling from source (this is not very workable in my current
> configuration management-based deployment setup)?
Hi,
does the problem persist after "apt-get update"?
There were some problems with the wheezy build (it depended on some
backport package which was unnecessary) so it was recompiled.
Christoph
--
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
Dan Fowler
DevOps Engineer
MindMixer
1735 Baltimore
Kansas City, MO 64108
В списке pgsql-pkg-debian по дате отправления: