Re: some queries on standby preventing replication updates
От | Joe Van Dyk |
---|---|
Тема | Re: some queries on standby preventing replication updates |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CACfv+pJ9G4cUvwre5MRqGj+romQZmQ29GK6Xf-AenOgaXcH=kQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: some queries on standby preventing replication updates (Emanuel Calvo <emanuel.calvo@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: some queries on standby preventing replication updates
Re: some queries on standby preventing replication updates Re: some queries on standby preventing replication updates |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Emanuel Calvo <emanuel.calvo@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
El 23/10/14 a las 17:40, Joe Van Dyk escibió:You may need to set a value on max_standby_streaming_delay, which> Hi,
>
> I have a master and a slave database.
>
> I've got hot_standby_feedback turned on,
> max_standby_streaming_delay=-1. I've configured the master and slave
> to keep a few days of WALs around.
>
> I've noticed that when some large queries are run on the standby
> machine (ones that take more than a minute or so), replication updates
> are paused. Is there a way to fix this?
>
controls the time
before cancelling the standby queries when a conflict occurs on a
wal-records-about-to-be-applied.
Source:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/runtime-config-replication.html
I'm using -1 for that option, would using something different be better?
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: