Re: Query performance in 9.6.24 vs 14.10
От | Bob Jolliffe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query performance in 9.6.24 vs 14.10 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CACd=f9fLxuOgtfb0RRi08Qn5edPOFUBK_E5q-DyC4gBqU7KbMg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Query performance in 9.6.24 vs 14.10 (Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Thanks for the update.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, 16:53 Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:
According to my tests, sometimes JIT is a little faster, and sometimes it's a little slower. Mostly within the realm of statistical noise (especially with each query having a sample size of only 13, on a VM that lives on a probably-busy host).On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:18 AM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> wrote:Yes, jit=on.I'll test them with jit=off, to see the difference. (The application is 3rd party, so will change it at the system level.)On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 7:09 AM Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> wrote:Out of curiosity, is the pg14 running with the default jit=on setting?This is obviously entirely due to the nature of the particular queries themselves, but we found that for our workloads that pg versions greater than 11 were exacting a huge cost due to the jit compiler. Once we explicitly turned jit=off we started to see improvements.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: