Re: Schema version management
От | Aidan Van Dyk |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Schema version management |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAC_2qU9ztQbX6Dg_ynomar1hNy_qcTuM3PHvyk29LzemdqzB5A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Schema version management ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Schema version management
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:57 PM, David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote: > On Jul 5, 2012, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> No they are not necessarily one logical unit. You could have a bunch of >> functions called, say, "equal" which have pretty much nothing to do with >> each other, since they refer to different types. >> >> +1 from me for putting one function definition per file. > > +1 for an option (I prefer one file for my projects, but might need multiple files for other projects). -1 I'd rather have the few overloaded-functions in one file (hopefully with deterministic ordering) and a sane, simple filename, than have every function in every database in a separate file with some strange mess in the filename that makes me cringe every time I see it. a. -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, aidan@highrise.ca command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: