Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
От | John Naylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CACPNZCsDoP6O_iPSyOJ0ZRD9Cyj+x0JH8u=ekNHb1tLQCH1GSw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 7:09 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the first two patches (a) removal of dead code in bootstrap > and (b) the core patch to avoid creation of FSM file for the small > table are good now. I have prepared the patches along with commit > message. There is no change except for some changes in README and > commit message of the second patch. Kindly let me know what you think > about them? Good to hear! The additional language is fine. In "Once the FSM is created for heap", I would just change that to "...for a heap". > I think these two patches can go even without the upgrade patch > (during pg_upgrade, conditionally skip transfer of FSMs.) which is > still under discussion. However, I am not in a hurry if you or other > thinks that upgrade patch must be committed along with the second > patch. I think the upgrade patch is generally going on track but > might need some more review. The pg_upgrade piece is a nice-to-have feature and not essential, so can go in later. Additional review is also welcome. -- John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: