Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment
От | jian he |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CACJufxGbCFdTnuaHOJe463UCnE-WE6XNRdE4dNSZrpKMyoagkQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 7:43 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > summary of attached patch: > > Thanks for the patches! > > > 01: make pg_restore not restore comments if comments associated > > objects are excluded. > > > TODO: need perl tests > > How about adding tests for pg_restore --no-policies in 002_pg_dump.pl, > as in the attached patch? > it works fine on my local linux machine. > Since --no-publications and --no-subscriptions have been around for a long time, > while --no-policies was added in v18, I wonder if it makes sense to first fix > the publications and subscriptions cases (and add tests for them) and back-patch > to all supported versions. Then we can handle the policies case and > back-patch it > only to v18. Does that sound reasonable? > works for me.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: