Re: BUG #18290: \di+ can not show the same name indexes
От | jian he |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18290: \di+ can not show the same name indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CACJufxFymzLOpMC5Sc8eHC0bAvotVN2RKEjHB=c9ZCsjJ1Sb0A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #18290: \di+ can not show the same name indexes (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 6:33 PM PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote: > > The following bug has been logged on the website: > > Bug reference: 18290 > Logged by: Yongtao Huang > Email address: yongtaoh2022@gmail.com > PostgreSQL version: 16.1 > Operating system: centos7 > Description: > > > gpadmin=# \di+ > List of relations > Schema | Name | Type | Owner | Table | Persistence | Access method | > Size | Description > -----------+------+-------+---------+-------+-------------+---------------+------------+------------- > pg_temp_3 | idx1 | index | gpadmin | t2 | temporary | btree | > 8192 bytes | > (1 row) > > ``` > Both table `t1` and temp table `t2` have index idx, but `\di` only shows the > index of table `t2`. > > Related link: https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/issues/15791 > > Bug catcher: Hao Zhang <hao-hz.zhang@broadcom.com> and Yongtao Huang > <yongtaoh2022@gmail.com> > you can use \set ECHO_HIDDEN to figure out the magic behind \di related post: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11024099/postgresql-outputting-query-of-underlying-function
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: