Re: in parentesis is not usual on DOCs
От | jian he |
---|---|
Тема | Re: in parentesis is not usual on DOCs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CACJufxFhaysmr0DrJSohKOXY_AntG3gzAFr1pZv7C0WMPLwQ3g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: in parentesis is not usual on DOCs (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: in parentesis is not usual on DOCs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 8:34 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote: > > > On 15 May 2024, at 14:04, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br> wrote: > > > Why (context_item), (path_expression) and (json_path_name) are inside a parentheses ? This is not usual when explainingany other feature. > > Agreed, that's inconsisent with how for example json_table_column is documented > in the next list item under COLUMNS. Unless objected to I will remove these > parenthesis. > >> The input data to query (context_item), the JSON path expression defining the query (path_expression) with an optionalname (json_path_name) i think the parentheses is for explaining that context_item refers "The input data to query"; path_expression refers "the JSON path expression defining the query"; json_path_name refers to "an optional name"; removing parentheses means we need to rephrase this sentence? So I come up with the following rephrase: The context_item specifies the input data to query, the path_expression is a JSON path expression defining the query, json_path_name is an optional name for the path_expression. The optional PASSING clause can provide data values to the path_expression.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: