Re: postmaster.pid file auto-clean up?
| От | Michael Clark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: postmaster.pid file auto-clean up? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CACAT_Ad1U1AUvK75h-km0OkwKDzmmufRoOGCc0Q47myqXByO5g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: postmaster.pid file auto-clean up? (Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com> wrote:
> We back our client application with PG,Are you certain that's necessary?
> each OSX user gets their own instance of PG.
It was a decision made, weighing various trade-offs, 4 years ago now.
> In the wild this scenario has arisen without intentional interference. In debugging, yes, we contrived the situation to replicate the behaviour. Mind you, we may be using PG in an environment that isn't advisable.What you replicated is not what happens when your problem occurs. Processes don't do things like that with each others PID files.
That is true.
But the system does recycle pids, especially after a reboot.
I appreciate all the feedback and input from everyone who responded.
Thank you!! You have answered our questions, and it gives us food for thought.
Michael.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: