Re: [PATCH] Generalized JSON output functions

<p dir="ltr">On Jul 11, 2015 8:41 PM, "Pavel Stehule" <<a
href="mailto:pavel.stehule@gmail.com">pavel.stehule@gmail.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > There is simple rule
-be strict on output and tolerant on input. If I understand to sense of this patch - the target is one same format of
JSONdocuments - so there are no space for any variability.<p dir="ltr">So, would you prefer explain json format on a
singleline - no indentation or whitespace whatsoever?<p dir="ltr">This far it was only about whitespace, but it can be
usefulfor tweaking other aspects of output, as I've mentioned before.<p dir="ltr">I can imagine the ability for
3rd-partycode to override certain aspects of the output would be really useful for extensions or background workers,
decodingplugins, etc.<p dir="ltr">> I am thinking so general json functions has sense, but I partially disagree with
yourimplementation.<p dir="ltr">Then what would you differently exactly?<p dir="ltr">--<br /> Alex