Re: [DOCS] Behavior of recovery_target_inclusive.
От | Tomonari Katsumata |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Behavior of recovery_target_inclusive. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAC55fYdSS80-bTqc7Z=MGvH=44e9ORAeQyXO7rarGhhr0_mCVA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Behavior of recovery_target_inclusive. (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Behavior of recovery_target_inclusive.
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Hi Michael
Thanks for your reply and quick reaction.
2017-10-23 23:05 GMT+09:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:27 PM, <t.katsumata1122@gmail.com> wrote:
> At "recovery_target_inclusive (boolean)", nothing is mentioned about
> "recovery_target_lsn".
> It should be fixed, since "recovery_target_lsn" is affected by the value of
> "recovery_target_inclusive".
>
> Could you check this?
Apologies. You are right, this is a documentation bug and should be
fixed. Attached is a patch to address the problem. The trend on the
documentation page for recovery parameters is to list the options
alphabetically, so recovery_target_lsn comes first.
--
Michael
Your patch seems good, but I have a question.
Does it need to fix the next sentence?
Like this:
----
This setting controls whether transactions having exactly the target WAL location (LSN), commit time or ID, respectively, will be included in the recovery.
----
Best regards,
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: