Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir()
От | Juan José Santamaría Flecha |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAC+AXB2Wve5=AxY=_khxoDAK7rq91fKKCD4i29JWjX8DTwpkXw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir() (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: A micro-optimisation for walkdir()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 9:37 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 2020-Sep-04, Thomas Munro wrote:
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ struct dirent
> {
> long d_ino;
> unsigned short d_reclen;
> + unsigned char d_type;
> unsigned short d_namlen;
> char d_name[MAX_PATH];
> };
> @@ -20,4 +21,26 @@ DIR *opendir(const char *);
> struct dirent *readdir(DIR *);
> int closedir(DIR *);
>
> +/* File types for 'd_type'. */
> +enum
> + {
> + DT_UNKNOWN = 0,
> +# define DT_UNKNOWN DT_UNKNOWN
Uhm ... what do these #defines do? They look a bit funny.
Would it make sense to give this enum a name, and then use that name in
struct dirent's definition, instead of unsigned char?
They mimic POSIX dirent.h. I would rather stick to that.
Regards,
Juan José Santamaría Flecha
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: