Re: HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed?
| От | Juan José Santamaría Flecha |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAC+AXB1EDXiRPmiVfh+WX79x5vXJDU17k0GkDjfyPgOWO4Y5og@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | HAVE_WORKING_LINK still needed? (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 2:15 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
I came across the HAVE_WORKING_LINK define in pg_config_manual.h.
AFAICT, hard links are supported on Windows and Cygwin in the OS
versions that we support, and pg_upgrade already contains the required
shim. It seems to me we could normalize and simplify that, as in the
attached patches. (Perhaps rename durable_link_or_rename() then.) I
successfully tested on MSVC, MinGW, and Cygwin.
The link referenced in the comments of win32_pghardlink() [1] is quite old, and is automatically redirected to the current documentation [2]. Maybe this patch should use the new path.
Regards,
Juan José Santamaría Flecha
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: