Re: pg_prewarm
От | Gurjeet Singh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_prewarm |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABwTF4XwGdLib1-3O3rR8ygcXXkq3g2CD_a05s_JQOY6snUZag@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_prewarm (Cédric Villemain <cedric@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Cédric Villemain <cedric@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Hi Cedric,
Can you please post the progress on this, if any.
I am planning on polishing up pg_prewarm based on the reviews. As others have said, I don't see a reason why both can't coexist, maybe in pgxn. I am all ears if you think otherwise.
Le samedi 23 juin 2012 02:47:15, Josh Berkus a écrit :> > The biggest problem with pgfincore from my point of view is that itI'll make it ready for. (not a huge task).
> > only works under Linux, whereas I use a MacOS X machine for my
> > development, and there is also Windows to think about. Even if that
> > were fixed, though, I feel we ought to have something in the core
> > distribution. This patch got more +1s than 95% of what gets proposed
> > on hackers.
>
> Fincore is only a blocker to this patch if we think pgfincore is ready
> to be proposed for the core distribution. Do we?
Hi Cedric,
Can you please post the progress on this, if any.
I am planning on polishing up pg_prewarm based on the reviews. As others have said, I don't see a reason why both can't coexist, maybe in pgxn. I am all ears if you think otherwise.
Best regards,
--
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: