Re: Proposing pg_hibernate
От | Gurjeet Singh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposing pg_hibernate |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABwTF4VtGN6654OVML9Nb9ktbJ4UD-J27kW2NKwwPF7jRqmjAg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposing pg_hibernate (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2014-06-04 14:50:39 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> The thing I was concerned about is that the system might have been in >> recovery for months. What was hot at the time the base backup was >> taken seems like a poor guide to what will be hot at the time of >> promotion. Consider a history table, for example: the pages at the >> end, which have just been written, are much more likely to be useful >> than anything earlier. > > I'd assumed that the hibernation files would simply be excluded from the > basebackup... Yes, they will be excluded, provided the BlockReader processes have finished, because each BlockReader unlinks its save-file after it is done restoring buffers listed in it. Best regards, -- Gurjeet Singh http://gurjeet.singh.im/ EDB www.EnterpriseDB.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: