Re: Better help output for pgbench -I init_steps
От | Gurjeet Singh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Better help output for pgbench -I init_steps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABwTF4V4c4yVGCA8OLTEeJf53sKDNxghj8yQi-b+rVhXbgsSZA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Better help output for pgbench -I init_steps (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Better help output for pgbench -I init_steps
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 3:08 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > > On 12.07.23 09:42, Gurjeet Singh wrote: > > These two variants show the two extremes; bare minimum vs. everything > > but the kitchen sink. So one may feel the need to find a middle ground > > and provide a "sufficient, but not too much" variant. I have attempted > > that in variants 3 and 4; also attached. > > If you end up with variant 3 or 4, please use double quotes instead of > single quotes. Will do. I believe you're suggesting this because in the neighboring help text the string literals use double quotes. I see that other utilities, such as psql also use double quotes in help text. If there's a convention, documented somewhere in our sources, I'd love to know and learn other conventions. Best regards, Gurjeet http://Gurje.et
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: