Re: MERGE ... RETURNING
| От | Gurjeet Singh |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: MERGE ... RETURNING |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABwTF4UOitwEwiPRmoirkZ=NuCmWhUnfN+ypKz_T6rrSCdX95Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: MERGE ... RETURNING (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 3:39 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2023-Jul-05, Gurjeet Singh wrote: > > I expected the .out file to have captured the stdout. I'm gradually, > > and gladly, re-learning bits of the test infrastructure. > > > > The DELETE command tag in the output does not feel appropriate for a > > COPY command that's using MERGE as the source of the data. > > You misread this one :-) The COPY output is there, the tag is not. So > DELETE is the value from pg_merge_action(), and "1 100" correspond to > the columns in the the sq_target row that was deleted. The command tag > is presumably MERGE 1. :-) That makes more sense. It matches my old mental model. Thanks for clarifying! Best regards, Gurjeet http://Gurje.et
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: