Re: PostgreSQL db
От | Frank Zhou |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL db |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABeXrnet8bnV=__XdpBvbD89eMRN+0EZfZaotyPOE2YaNXB4AQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL db (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL db
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Hi, Kevin
We are using client side pg_bouncer, do you think it is also an acceptable option?
Thanks
Frank
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote:
Amit Sharma <asharma@verts.co.in> wrote:> "Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote:
>> Personally, I managed a machine which typically had 3000 users
>> running queries against it while about 20 million
>> INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statements per day were run against it.
>> Tuning showed best performance when we used connection pools
>> with 35 connections for read-only queries and 6 connections for
>> the DML.> May I know the machine configuration esp. the hardwareIt had 16 cores and 256GB RAM, a RAID controller with 256MB
> configuration that you used for this setup?
battery-backed RAM configured for write-back for a 40 drive RAID 5
array, with a separate BBU controller for a RAID 1 pair for the OS
and another for the WAL (pg_xlog directory).
Oh, and the database was over 3TB and growing fairly quickly.--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: