Re: Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
| От | Laetitia Avrot |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB_COdhMAidXfeCyye9OOhech6bU6-SC4ZLw4t8CcCBkJ=5qgw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ? (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump new feature: exporting functions only. Bad or good idea ?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Chapman,
Le ven. 25 mars 2022 à 00:42, Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> a écrit :
On 03/27/21 08:57, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> We can bikeshed the name of the flag at some stage. --procedures-only
> might also make sense
Any takers for --routines-only ?
"Routine" is the genuine, ISO SQL umbrella term for a function or
procedure, and we have used it that way in our docs and glossary.
Thank you so much for your suggestion. I was really excited to find a generic term for Functions and Procedures, but "routine" also includes aggregation functions which I had excluded from my feature (see Postgres Glossary here: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/glossary.html#GLOSSARY-ROUTINE).
I had decided not to include aggregate functions when I designed my patch because I thought most users wouldn't expect them in the result file. Was I wrong?
Have a nice day,
Lætitia
Regards,
-Chap
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: