Re: Ask about bug numbering rules in pgsql-bugs mailing list
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ask about bug numbering rules in pgsql-bugs mailing list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABV9wwOrXL=suRA2jR4Yief8ePSxXVfCxzP2Z-of+a1-sbx9oQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Ask about bug numbering rules in pgsql-bugs mailing list (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 9:19 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > On 2024-Mar-07, Jiangshan Liu wrote: > > > Hello! > > I'm writing my thesis expecting to refer to commit issues on the PostgreSQL website pgsql-bugs mailing list via bug numbering,but I'm concerned that some of the commit issues are not numbered (e.g., https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1958255.PYKUYFuaPT%40aivenlaptop#1bdd1e237c4858f85b0313522c6bad2c ), and I'm curiousabout this, so I'd like to ask you for what reason this is happening, please! Thank you > > We have a web interface to report bugs, which assigns numbers to them; > this interface simply copies the text to an email to the pgsql-bugs > mailing list, including the assigned number. However, many bugs are > reported not via the web interface but instead by direct email to the > same pgsql-bugs mailing list or even to another one (frequently > pgsql-hackers, but others too); these do not get any number. That's > exactly what happened in the case you quote. > > We don't have a central bug tracking system. > That said, it is still quite possible to track bugs in Postgres; simple even. https://twitter.com/robtreat2/status/1556991088912654337 Robert Treat https://xzilla.net
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: