Re: hba.c:3160:18: warning: comparison of unsigned enum expression
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: hba.c:3160:18: warning: comparison of unsigned enum expression |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEzyHd7_69oAKS3N5fUxnd2D0Ov2Pi5UY5bOt_LxskiCqA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: hba.c:3160:18: warning: comparison of unsigned enum expression (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: hba.c:3160:18: warning: comparison of unsigned enum expression
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:17 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 02:01:42PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > That's very close to mine (see one email later). Let's bikeshed about > > the details. I think it's basically the same for current usecases, but > > that taking the UserAuth as the parameter is cleaner and potentially > > more useful for the future. > > Missed it, sorry about that. Using UserAuth as argument is fine by > me. If you wish to apply that, please feel free. I am fine to do > that myself, but that will have to wait until tomorrow my time. Ok, I'll go ahead and push it. Thanks for confirming the fix! -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: