Re: New archives for testing
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New archives for testing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEzuGZNWKPG+KeU1hSq+Gr0c9J-TQJGx0kvQzoiLL+a_4w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New archives for testing (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 03:05:58PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> > >> >> Now, having said that, I'd like to see some more people testing it >> >> than the few people I've forced to do it so far. The way to test it is >> >> to go to http://www.postgresql.org/list/ and pick your list. You can >> >> also go to http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/<message-id> to view a >> >> message in a thread - that should also work fine if you just replace >> >> "archives" with "www" in the URL of an existing message in the >> >> archives *if* you were using the message-id based url. >> > >> > Actually, hold the presses. See this message: >> > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20110907091634.GL24583@sonic.net >> > It says "the patch is attached", but there is no attachment. >> > The old archives do contain the patch. >> >> Bug found and fixed. The problem was that we missed attachments that >> were text/plain, did not have a name, but did have a filename. I first >> thought it was another case of the From line in mbox, but if you >> looked at the raw output you could see that we actually had the whole >> thing in there. So in passing, I also wrote a small tool that lets us >> reparse messages that are already in the db, whenever we change/fix >> the parsing rules. > > The following message exhibits similar symptoms; the attachment appears in the > raw and mbox versions only: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130103031358.GB11705@tornado.leadboat.com > > It, too, is text/plain with a "filename" and no "name". Some attachments I > sent on 2013-01-08, using the same email toolchain, show up fine. Yeah, Alvaro fixed that one - I just wanted to note it here so you knew it was fixed :) We haven't figured out how to auto-reparse all those messages yet, so right now we're fixing them on a case by case basis when they're found. So keep reporting them! --Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: