Re: [HACKERS] Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEzsHVXXFnNfoj+f-s_hXKGRJdM5fW6QxS6p-b62KTSnLw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
-- On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'd vote for including this in v10. There doesn't seem to be any
>> downside to this: it's a no brainer to avoid our exploding hash table
>> case when we can see it coming.
>
> Anybody else want to vote that way? For myself it's getting a bit late
> in the beta process to be including inessential changes, but I'm willing
> to push it to v10 not just v11 if there's multiple people speaking for
> that.
I'd vote for waiting until v11. I think it's too late to be doing
things that might change good plans into bad ones or visca versa;
that's a recipe for having to put out 10.1 and 10.2 a little quicker
than I'd like.
+1 for waiting until v11 with it.
We have plenty enough other things that could end up needing a quick post-release-release, and those are things that have received at least somem testing...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: