Re: Documentation: references to old versions
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Documentation: references to old versions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEzqQCXo-qo0Ox=j7CuMPi4bzYGQUn1+s56b94yV+e+LiA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Documentation: references to old versions (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Documentation: references to old versions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > > Hi > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> While reading some documentation, I noticed that we have references to >> past releases. For example, >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/xfunc-c.html mentions "A >> magic block is required as of PostgreSQL 8.2". Sure, this is true even >> as of 9.2 or even 9.3. There are a few more such references that I >> could spot with a simple grep in the doc/src/sgml directory. I wonder >> if this is worth fixing. I don't know sgml enough, but if it supports >> some sort of a meta-tag, then it might help to replace specific >> version references with something like <CURRENT_MAJOR_RELEASE> so that >> the current major version gets substituted when docs for that release >> are built. > > > The phrasing "as of 8.2" basically means "from 8.2 onwards". Changing the > version there would make the text incorrect. In theory we could remove that reference completely since any versions where it does not apply are out of support since years ago at this point. But I don't see a point in doing that just for the sake of removing - but if a section is reworded in general that contains such references, it could be dropped. -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: