Re: pg_basebackup compression TODO item
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_basebackup compression TODO item |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEzei1MXSc-LDK=uOMpa6GZgUYTd=VNqHH_F2KoKrOqgFw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup compression TODO item (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_basebackup compression TODO item
Re: pg_basebackup compression TODO item |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2016-03-03 18:31:03 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I think we want it at protocol level rather than pg_basebackup level.
I think we may want both eventually, but I do agree that protocol level
has a lot higher "priority" than that. Something like protocol level
compression has a bit of different tradeofs than compressing base
backups, and it's nice not to compress, uncompress, compress again.
Yeah, good point, we definitely want both. Based on the field experience I've had (which might differ from others), having it protocol level would help more people tough, so should be higher prio.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: