Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEzKN3eRz-EXiXVJoVv5rYfBEpSt+mMfdD96zR2j=72UPw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 16:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com> writes: >> (2011/10/25 19:15), Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> I have not looked at the code itself, but I wonder if we shouldn't >>> consider making this a part of core-proper, not just a contrib module. >>> The fact that it isn't *already* available in core surprises a lot of >>> people... > >> Do you mean that pgsql_fdw should be a built-in extension like plpgsql >> so that it's available just after initdb? > > If that was what he meant, I'd vote against it. There are way too many > people who will *not* want their databases configured to be able to > reach out onto the net. This feature should be something that has to be > installed by explicit user action. That is not what I meant. I meant installed the shared library by defualt, but still require CREATE EXTENSION. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: