Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId?
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEzE13vvweyHi3+86Gg0qJcwgCfKFNHRAyrSWd2rkxrW1Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
> Well these kinds of monitoring systems tend to be used by operations
> people who are a lot more practical and a lot less worried about
> theoretical concerns like that.
+1, well said.
+1 as well. I think these people would be perfectly find by it changing across a version upgrade as long as they know that's the deal. *Most* of the time there is no version upgrade going on, so it would work fine that time.
Most operations people already deal with a lot of such parameters changing around. I'm sure most of them would be more than happy with an improvement, even if it's not mathematically perfect.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: