Re: Small race in pg_xlogdump --follow
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Small race in pg_xlogdump --follow |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEzBFutx6piBKu0EOcUDJ18BzgiQAiZ5zMV=HWXg2WSDog@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Small race in pg_xlogdump --follow (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Oh, right, at the very last loop. I've never seen it need more than 1 loop
> so I didn't manage to hit that codepath :) But yeah, saving errno and
> restoring it on the other side of pg_usleep is probably a good idea.
Right. On a larger scale --- I'm too uncaffeinated to figure out whether
this is the code path taken for the initially user-supplied file name.
But it would be unfriendly if when you fat-finger the command line
arguments, it takes 5 seconds for pg_xlogdump to tell you so. Maybe
the looping behavior should only happen on non-first file access.
It's a different codepath, so the retry does not happen on that. Different error message, even. ("could not open file" vs "could not find file").
I'll go commit this including a source code comment about why the loop is there that was missing.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: