Re: New CF app deployment

On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:

One thing that would probably *help* is if the list of attachments
mentioned the names of the files that were attached to each message
rather than just noting that they have some kind of attachment.  If
people name their attachments sensibly, then you'll be able to
distinguish parallel-seqscan-v23.patch from
test-case-that-breaks-parallel-seqscan.sql, and that would be nice.

Yes, I was going to request that as well. 

Ok, this is easy enough. There's a field missing in an API call but it shouldn't be that hard - I'll add this to the short term todo.