Re: Gotchas about pg_verify_checksums

> On 15 Apr 2018, at 09:36, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:27:19PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Thinking more on this, I don’t think the -f option should be in the tool until
>> we have the ability to turn on/off checksums.  Since checksums are always on,
>> or always off, -f is at best confusing IMO.  The attached patch removes -f,
>> when we can turn checksums on/off we can rethink how -f should behave.
>
> You have forgotten to update the list of arguments in getopt().

Doh. Thanks, fixed in attached patch.