Re: logical changeset generation v6
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: logical changeset generation v6 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEyouHTjCgxS9uhYwkr3VFfDhwZ=dznvcSwfSWewMHs1Ag@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: logical changeset generation v6 (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: logical changeset generation v6
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 2014-04-24 09:39:21 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:I went with pg_recvlogical because that's where the (small) majority
> I can't find that this discussion actually came to a proper consensus, but
> I may be missing something. Did we go with pg_recvlogical just because we
> couldn't decide on a better name, or did we intentionally decide it was the
> best?
seemed to be. Even if I was unconvinced. There were so many outstanding
big fights at that point that I didn't want to spend my time on this ;)
I was guessing something like the second part there, which is why I figured this would be a good time to bring this fight back up to the surface ;)
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: