Re: [pgaweb][patch] Use https link for git repo
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgaweb][patch] Use https link for git repo |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEymKF+GBZ7=NedvfpKfh1CvqEUo_VWC4du+L70aQGPuBQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgaweb][patch] Use https link for git repo (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgaweb][patch] Use https link for git repo
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Matthew Kleiman <mkleiman@pivotal.io> wrote:bump.On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 3:58 AM Matthew Kleiman <mkleiman@pivotal.io> wrote:Hi Hackers,As per discussion on https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAGRPzo-_dSYr5 Y1D%2B0uBLo39Bb6MVTg3%3DCM% 3DhrmX7LdF%3DfQbhQ%40mail. gmail.com#CAGRPzo-_dSYr5Y1D+ 0uBLo39Bb6MVTg3=CM=hrmX7LdF= fQbhQ@mail.gmail.com, I've updated the pgadmin website with the attached patch. Instead of the docs pointing developers to an ssh repo link, it points them to https. HiI prefer to keep it as git:// - I've seen caching weirdness with http(s) in the past.
Those weirdnesses *should* all be gone if it uses the smart http mode, which we didn't support until a few weeks ago, but do now.
git:// is supported, and per the thread, Magnus did fix the issue seen. Is there any other reason to change it?
Security? In particular, MITM:ing initial connections etc.
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: