Re: replication wordsmithing / clarifications

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 07:16:43PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> A recent discussion on slack prompted me to read through the
> high-availability section of the docs, turning in to some suggested
> changes that hopefully clarify how the various replication options
> work (specifically around logical and trigger-based solutions). A
> proposed patch is attached, lmk if you have questions.

A portion of what you are suggesting here is in line with 9e101cf,
which looks like a good thing.  Most of the changes look like
improvements to me, and here are some comments.

+     queries to a designated primary server. Operating on a per-tablebasis,
+     the primary server sends data changes (typically) asynchronously to the
+     replica node(s).  Replica nodes can answer queries while the primary is
Could it be better to use "one or more replica clusters" here?