Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEyjOmar2GdxPrkm1UA-jEdN2m3ie-GWvwi=Hh4SZrDaSA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>> 2017-03-18 14:00 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>:
>>>> I just noticed that createlang and droplang have been listed as
>>>> deprecated since PG 9.1.
>>>> Do we dare remove them?
>
>> (I'd extend it to all the non-prefixed pg binaries, but let's open that can
>> of worms right now, one thing at a time)
>
> To my mind, these two and createuser/dropuser are the only really serious
> namespacing problems among our standard binaries.  The ones with names
> ending in "db" don't seem likely to cause huge confusion.  I suppose that
> if we were naming it today, "psql" wouldn't get that name; but the chances
> of renaming that one are certainly zero, namespace conflict or no.
>
> But createuser/dropuser are a real problem, because they certainly could
> be mistaken for system-level utilities.

Well, let's do one thing at a time.  I think it'd be fine to drop
createlang and droplang; we can discuss other things on other threads.

+1. I see no issues at all dropping createlang/droplang, so let's do that. Some of the others can be worth discussing, so let's not wait for that to pan out before these are removed. 

--

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Configurable file mode mask
Следующее
От: Jan Michálek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Other formats in pset like markdown, rst, mediawiki