Re: Bad sorting on source
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bad sorting on source |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEyb2Q02j-Nv57NNeVznMGn2VyQ7ZbULan1qm8aYsbi=qg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bad sorting on source (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bad sorting on source
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:
yeah - there is usually not a lot of testing done on newer/olderOn 02/18/2014 06:35 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> 2014-02-18 14:14 GMT+09:00 Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>:
>> 2014-02-04 20:19 GMT+09:00 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>:
>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2014-02-04 Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey,
>>>>>
>>>>> When we go to download PostgreSQL from the website we show ancient
>>>>> versions
>>>>> first:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/
>>>>>
>>>>> We should show the current versions first.
>>>>
>>>> I get my source mainly from GIT these days, but now you mention it I've
>>>> been
>>>> annoyed by having to scroll down the growing list to find the latest
>>>> versions,
>>>> so +1 from me. I can put my keyboard where my mouth is if there's some
>>>> coding needed to fix this.
>>>
>>>
>>> I know somebody was working on this before, but I can't actually remember
>>> who it was :O
>>>
>>> I don't think I've seen a patch.
>>>
>>> Thus you are more than welcome to contribute :) git.postgresql.org, project
>>> is "pgweb" :)
>>
>> (...time passes…)
>>
>> Stupid question from someone not terribly familiar with Python frameworks -
>> the installation instructions say "django *version 1.4*", is 1.4 a
>> specific requirement
>> or would later versions work? (I have 1.5.1 available right now).
>
> OK, it looks like 1.4 is needed, I get a "No module named simple" error
> with 1.5.1.
versions of python/django than what is in Debian Wheezy (or rather
Debian stable at a given time) because that is our deployment target for
production.
Needless to say that we will also take patches for making it work with
newer versions as well to save us some time on the next upgrade ;)
Absolutely. It's probably not a huge set of updates to work, but they do need to be done :) Of course, the next debian stable will have Django 1.6, so we're likely just going to bypass 1.5.
And of course, any such patches need to be backwards compatible.
Personally I just set up a virtualenv with exactly the same version, to make sure I test on the same thing that goes in prod.
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: