Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEyYgEyuLGHjZ5z81Gw3Rfosm3ZmegAVht0DpWf4nva0+A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<p dir="ltr"><br /> On Apr 9, 2015 2:20 AM, "Robert Haas" <<a href="mailto:robertmhaas@gmail.com">robertmhaas@gmail.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > On Apr 9, 2015, at 1:08 AM,Andres Freund <<a href="mailto:andres@anarazel.de">andres@anarazel.de</a>> wrote:<br /> > > I'm not convincedwe really need a version that closes and moves a entry. But if we indeed want it we can just name it "moved".<br/> ><br /> > +1.<p dir="ltr">Is that at +1 for naming it moved, or for not having it? :-)<p dir="ltr">Ican definitely go with moved. Buy I would like to keep it - the reason for having it in the first place is tomake the history of the patch follow along when it goes to the next cf. If we don't have the move option, I think it'slikely that we'll be back to the same patch having multiple completely unrelated entries in different cfs. <p dir="ltr">/Magnus<br />
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: