Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEyU=kt6PP3V=oRkxXAARuGZo1nbz5YWSu1um0e+E4X4cw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 02:02:58PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Again, I am fine putting this as a subsection of the release notes,
> but
> > let's not pretend it is some extra section we can remove in five
> years.
> >
> >
> > Depends on what we decide to do about it, but sure, it could certainly
> turn
> > into another section that we keep around (whether as part of the release
> notes,
> > or as a separate "upgrade steps" section or something).
>
> I suggest whatever we do, we place the information in a permanent
> location that isn't moved or removed.
>
>
>
> +1. Absolutely. That's a very important point.
That is really my only point --- wherever you put it, expect it to live
there forever.
Then in the end, it turns out we're in strong agreement :)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: