Re: Search points to ancient manuals
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Search points to ancient manuals |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEyTXVBJQsqKCNWFz1CA_2QQoU0CsWeVX5wMzQbqc_RuyA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Search points to ancient manuals (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Search points to ancient manuals
|
Список | pgsql-www |
<p dir="ltr"><br /> On Oct 31, 2012 6:51 PM, "Josh Berkus" <<a href="mailto:josh@agliodbs.com">josh@agliodbs.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > On 10/30/12 3:53 PM, Kevin Grittnerwrote:<br /> > > Josh Berkus wrote:<br /> > ><br /> > >> 1. go to <a href="http://postgresql.org">postgresql.org</a>home page.<br /> > >><br /> > >> 2. type "compile postgres"in the search box.<br /> > >><br /> > >> 3. the first result will be the installation chapterfrom the 6.5<br /> > >> version of the manual.<br /> > ><br /> > > Of course, if you search for"compile postgresql" the top two entries<br /> > > are for 9.2. Perhaps we should make those equivalent in searches?<br/> ><br /> > Well, we could really use some way to make docs other than the current<br /> > versionhave a much lower score, automatically. I don't know how to<br /> > implement this, though.<br /><p dir="ltr">Wealready do this for Google, so it shouldn't be rocket science.<p dir="ltr">At one point we just didn't indexthe unsupported versions at all, but we turned that back on when we realized the cure was worse than the disease. However,it seems we never got around to downing the priority of the old docs. <p dir="ltr">It's just so a sql query of course,so patches welcome ;) <p dir="ltr">/Magnus <br />
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: