Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEyREEfsvgJyZNAgnkeCDqCvB5kS5KbG8R1omoJcRSuHXg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Pg_upgrade speed for many tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
pg_dumpall is already doing lots of gymnastics with SQL, and pg_upgradeOn Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 03:30:32PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> BTW, does pg_upgrade run pg_restore in --single-transaction mode?
> >> That would probably make synchronous_commit moot, at least for that
> >> step.
>
> > It doesn't use pg_restore at all - it uses the dump from pg_dumpall, which
> > you can't reload with pg_restore.
>
> Sorry, I should've said psql --single-transaction. Although that isn't
> going to work either given the presence of \connect commands in the
> script. I wonder whether pg_dumpall ought to have some sort of "one
> transaction per database please" option.
splits the output file into db/user creation and object creation, so I
am hesitant to add anything more in there.
What about running pg_dump in a loop instead of pg_dumpall?
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: