Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:

On 03/22/2016 09:10 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> While having parallelism is awesome, it's only going to affect a
> (arguably small or big depending on your viewpoint) subset of users.
> It's going to be massive for those users, but it's not going to be
> useful for anywhere near as many users as streaming replication+hot
> standby+pg_upgrade in 9.0, or pitr+windows in 8.0. And yes, the vacuum
> freeze thing is also going to be great - for a small subset of users
> (yes, those users are in a lot of pain now).
>
>
> I had a discussion with Marko T just a couple of weeks back, and the
> conclusion then was that at the time, 9.6 had almost nothing that would
> even make the cut for a press release. We now have these two features,
> which are great features, but I'm not sure it's enough for such a big
> symbolical bump.

Wait, pglogical didn't make it?