Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I've been experimenting with moving the Unix socket directory to
> /var/run/postgresql for the Fedora distribution (don't ask :-().
> It's mostly working, but I found out yet another way that pg_upgrade
> can crash and burn: it doesn't consider the possibility that the
> old or new postmaster is compiled with a different default
> unix_socket_directory than what is compiled into the libpq it's using
> or that pg_dump is using.
>
> This is another hazard that we could forget about if we had some way for
> pg_upgrade to run standalone backends instead of starting a postmaster.

Yeah, that would be nice.


> But in the meantime, I suggest it'd be a good idea for pg_upgrade to
> explicitly set unix_socket_directory (or unix_socket_directories in
> HEAD) when starting the postmasters, and also explicitly set PGHOST
> to ensure that the client-side code plays along.

That sounds like a good idea for other reasons as well - manual
connections attempting to get in during an upgrade will just fail with
a "no connection" error, which makes sense...

So, +1.

-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/