Re: replication commands and log_statements
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: replication commands and log_statements |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEy=X-gEfARtTC_R2R1G5ap6B4c0AjCo9yC1tuxyy1jjfQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: replication commands and log_statements (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: replication commands and log_statements
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
-- On 2014-06-11 14:22:43 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:That's a reasonable feature request - but imo it's a separate
> Yes, but how would you specify for example "i want DDL and all replication
> commands" (which is quite a reasonable thing to log, I believe). If you
> actually require it to be set to "all", most people won't have any use at
> all for it...
one. It seems pretty noncontroversial and simple to make
log_statement=all log replication commands. What you want - and you're
sure not alone with that - is something considerably more complex...
I'm just saying if we're going to do it, let's do it right from the beginning.
Or are you suggesting this would be something we'd backpatch? Given the lack of complaints about it, I'd rather suggest we don't backpatch anything, and instead make the correct feature in the first pace for the next release.
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: