Re: 9.5 CF1
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.5 CF1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevExnQu5xgObAYg777vyWnN+AAdfEHoYVcOBHqPapsX6_Gw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.5 CF1 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:Worth noting also is that Magnus is working on a new version of the
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> P.S. If you tag your reviews with [REVIEW] in the Subject, it'll be
>>> easier to keep track of them.
>> I and, I believe, various other people hate that style, because at
>> least in Gmail, it breaks the threading. It is much easier to find
>> things if they are all posted on one thread.
> Yes, please don't do that. A simple, normal reply to the message that
> submits the patch is much better from my point of view as a subsequent
> reviewer and committer.
commitfest app that will be able to automatically keep track of threads
about patches --- so long as they *are* threads according to our mailing
list archives. I'm not sure if the archives recognize replies with a
changed Subject: as being the same thread or not.
The archives code does threading based on the headers (in-reply-to and references, in priority order). It completely ignores the subject when it comes to the threading.
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: