Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psycopg is the new psycopg3? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevExkgsHWcWEEP9yzMce+U=5xyMzcMR8X5JbonioKaNx7QQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | psycopg is the new psycopg3? (Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com>) |
Список | psycopg |
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 6:12 PM Daniele Varrazzo <daniele.varrazzo@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have received some concerned voices in regard to have a package called "psycopg3". I guess many have been burned outby the Python 2 to 3 transition, and now it's not a happy pair of number to see next to each other. Sorry, Fibonacci... > > The rationale behind having the 2 in the package name was to allow the coexistence between v1 and 2. But now that nobodyuses v1 anymore, I think the name can be considered free. I believe it even predates pypi and the requirements.txtconvention. Dark times... > > Anyone against using "psycopg" as package name, and starting from 3 as version number? This is a not entirely unsimilar case to what pgAdmin4 is going through right now (they started with pgadmin4 version 1.0, which then led to a lot of confusion for people). Thus, regardless of if you call it psycopg or psycopg3, please make sure you start with version 3 :) -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке psycopg по дате отправления: