Re: 1.16 beta 1 ?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 1.16 beta 1 ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevExgg006LLkZpn6__9Hu9MrEifLNEGLAa1hGJLot3BSYdA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 1.16 beta 1 ? (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: 1.16 beta 1 ?
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 09:11 +0100, Dave Page wrote: >> >> >> On Monday, May 7, 2012, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> > Given that it's self contained, and we *do* expect it to get in >> > eventually, how many places would you have to put #ifdef's in to >> leave >> > the code in the main branch and just not have it build there? >> > > Not much. It would be quite easy to do. Then I suggest that path. >> If Guillaume is going to continue to work on the feature, I'd be happy >> with #ifdef's and a configure switch to enable that code. >> > > I want to continue the work on it. But to be completely honest, it isn't > my priority. My priority is to get new releases of pgAdmin with the > biggest support of the new PostgreSQL features. That seems like reasonable priorities. But if it were to decent to the point of being basically "dead code", it shuld be removed. > I'll work on a patch with the ifdef's. It'll be much less work. Good. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: