Re: Adding Node support in outfuncs.c and readfuncs.c
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding Node support in outfuncs.c and readfuncs.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevExekqCGfv7TrA3FssrDcShuGRv3JN7WauOT9jEp8e74hw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding Node support in outfuncs.c and readfuncs.c (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adding Node support in outfuncs.c and readfuncs.c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:50, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: >> What you've got here could be useful >> to people who use emacs and understand they've got to hand-check the >> results. I'm not sure how much further it'd be useful to go. > > Agreed. That's the reason why I'm proposing src/tools/editors in the > first place. I find that it's enough for most of the Nodes I've been > dealing with recently (all the ones that initdb uses, for starters), and > for the other ones it helps a lot in adding the to-be-hand-edited code > at the right place in the right files. > > The goal for this tool is to be more useful an advice to Emacs users > than the usual "pick another patch that added syntax in the past and try > to reproduce what it did as far as nodes support functions goes". > > I can also maintain that in a separate git repository on github, but > that only reduces the already very thin population that could find it > useful. Since people seem to be less than super-enthusiastic about putting into the core distro, perhaps it would at least be a good startingpoint to do this? Should we perhaps consider a "postgres developer tools" common repository with just a random bunch of tools that people come up with (I assume there are more than just one of them sitting around peoples environments..) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: